Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Temperature: -15°C Clouds: Clear Skies
Maribor, Slovenia.
Temperature: -14°C Conditions: Mist Clouds: Clear Skies
Portoroz, Slovenia.
Temperature: -4°C Clouds: Cloud and Visibility OK

Žurnal’s hard-hitting, high-quality pre-election front-page coverage.
Yesterday was the second round of mayoral elections in Slovenia. Here in Maribor, the race was won by Franc Kangler, despite a hardcore media blitz by his opponent Gregor Pivec. It was a curious race, and there’s a lot to say about it, but right now I’m interested in just one thing: the piece of shit that was the pre-election edition of the free weekly newspaper Žurnal.
I know that it’s not exactly a respected paper, but it has a high circulation (253,000 by their count) and it’s widely distributed. By my reckoning, their pre-election coverage contained four glowing stories about candidate Gregor Pivec, one “mini interview” with Franc Kangler’s wife, and a neutral one about them both. This paper should be studied in journalism school as an example of how not to be objective, how not to be a journalist, and how to disgrace an entire profession. Most of the articles are unsigned (making their authorship an interesting question) but the hack behind the rest is Katarina Pernat.
Here are the headlines from stories written about candidate Gregor Pivec:
1) Dober program zagotovilo za uspešen razvoj Maribora1
(A good program guarantees the successful growth of Maribor)
2) Za Pivcem stojijo strokovnjaki
(Professionals behind Pivec)
3) “Vse povem v obraz!”2
(”I say everything to people’s face!”)
4) SoviÄ? za Gregorja Pivca, Stojan Auer bi najpodprl Pivca3
[Outgoing Mayor Boris] SoviÄ? is for Gregor Pivec, and [former candidate] Stojan Auer supposedly supports Pivec
Here are the headlines from stories about candidate Franc Kangler:
1) Mini Intervju: Tanja Kangler stoji za svojim možem4
(Mini Interview: Tanja Kangler stands by her man)
Special Bonus Propaganda:
In the street poll on page four [Mnenja (Opinions)] four out of five people support Pivec. So much for displaying a fair, representative sample.
Finally, and perhaps crucially, here are the number of paid advertisements that appeared in the pre-election edition:
Campaign ads for Pivec: 1
Campaign ads for Kangler: 0
Comments for this post are closed.
How utterly fair and balanced. Looks like they tooks lessons from the Republicans and Democrats over in the U.S., who don’t even suggest things; no, they either manufacture or dig up something ugly on their opponents and smear it out in TV ads and the likes. And just some hours ago, I heard the Socialists in France are doing it to their own, with her two - male - opposers releasing a taped party meeting behind closed doors in order to prevent Ségolène Royale (what a name, you just have to like her for that alone ;-)) becoming the first female - and strong favorite - candidate for the upcoming presidential election and throwing their political weight with the media and the unions to get the job done. All’s fair in love, war and politics, I guess. Ugly…
Actually, Žurnal is widely known for this kind of cheap propaganda. A couple of months ago, when the election campaign was just about to begin, we published a commentary with basically the same theme as this post - so rest assured that this was not a one-off event.
Just last week Žurnal celebrated its 3rd birthday, and apparently it is doubtful if it will live to see the fourth. Hope not!
After having to digest campaign commercials from the US for the past month, I feel there is still an honest difference between a smear campaign from one party, to a strongly subjective article (or series) that is distributed to a quarter of a million readers.
I would still rather watch smear ads (which can sometimes be stupidly ) than to know I am not being given a fair coverage of current events.
Sorry, I messed up the link somehow. The sentence was:
“Which can sometimes be stupidly entertaining”
Zurnal is not a newspaper. It is a commercial add paper with some articles which guarantee that the commercials can not be banned from the mailboxes. Every article there is for sale and I think that they just assured them self another two years of prosperity with this election campaign.
@cija: apparently not, because they are said to be losing advertisers rapidly.
That’s the government propaganda machine for you. But on the other hand, Zurnal is a privately owned newspaper and they can support whoever they want. OK, we know that newspapers should at least apeare to be somewhat objective and balanced, but that is really up to them. Zurnal never really had any credibility, so they actually had nothing to lose.
Just shows you how far the evil claw of Karl Rove extends.
Well, the Ljubljana edition of Žurlan provides as distinguished journalism as the MariborÄ?an one.
Hardly one issue goes out without a stab at Drnovšek and a praise for almighty Janša.
As once quoted: “Bad politicians are elected by good citizens who do not vote.�
I didn’t vote. Does this make Kangler bad politician?
@Good citizen: the sentence
“Good citizens who do not vote� does not implement that everybody who does not vote is automatically good; like every fish is not a trout but the opposite is true! But I do not wont to say this means Kangler is good.
a pre-electoral edition of Ljubljana version also had a few articles about events in Ljubljana the previous week. The interesting thing is that almost everywhere possible they included a photo of the mayor D.SimÅ¡iÄ? taking part in the event (speeches etc).
I would have to agree with Marko. Žurnal is just a paper with letters and colour on it and absolutly not a reliable source of info. But when you think about elections a horrible thought comes to my mind that is actualy voters who vote and voters get what they want. Can you realy say that one was better than the other? It is all the same to me.
Oh I am truly sorry it was cija who made the comment and not Marko