Recent Comments
  • Michael M.: Too much going on. Life in flux, etc..
  • Sunshine: Wow, I was soooo happy to see a new post in my rss reader. I was hopping this is already the comeback! :(...
  • gandalf: Did you only get caffeine through Dr.p or did you drink coffee as well? I’m interested, since...
  • neeka: nine kilos… wow… :) happy holidays to you, michael, and to all your loved ones! veronica
  • m: It was a bargain. No strings attached.
Search
 
Web Carniola

November 2006
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Clear Skies Temperature: -15°C Clouds: Clear Skies

Maribor, Slovenia.
Mist Temperature: -14°C Conditions: Mist Clouds: Clear Skies

Portoroz, Slovenia.
Cloud and Visibility OK Temperature: -4°C Clouds: Cloud and Visibility OK

Special Mention
AlienMelon
Burger.si
Heck
Izklop
si.blogs
Sloblogi
Blogorola
Natalija Verboten
Hosting By
domenca-logo.gif
Dissecting Žurnal

zurnal.jpg
Žurnal’s hard-hitting, high-quality pre-election front-page coverage.

Yesterday was the second round of mayoral elections in Slovenia. Here in Maribor, the race was won by Franc Kangler, despite a hardcore media blitz by his opponent Gregor Pivec. It was a curious race, and there’s a lot to say about it, but right now I’m interested in just one thing: the piece of shit that was the pre-election edition of the free weekly newspaper Žurnal.

I know that it’s not exactly a respected paper, but it has a high circulation (253,000 by their count) and it’s widely distributed. By my reckoning, their pre-election coverage contained four glowing stories about candidate Gregor Pivec, one “mini interview” with Franc Kangler’s wife, and a neutral one about them both. This paper should be studied in journalism school as an example of how not to be objective, how not to be a journalist, and how to disgrace an entire profession. Most of the articles are unsigned (making their authorship an interesting question) but the hack behind the rest is Katarina Pernat.

Here are the headlines from stories written about candidate Gregor Pivec:

1) Dober program zagotovilo za uspešen razvoj Maribora1
(A good program guarantees the successful growth of Maribor)

2) Za Pivcem stojijo strokovnjaki
(Professionals behind Pivec)

3) “Vse povem v obraz!”2
(”I say everything to people’s face!”)

4) SoviÄ? za Gregorja Pivca, Stojan Auer bi najpodprl Pivca3
[Outgoing Mayor Boris] SoviÄ? is for Gregor Pivec, and [former candidate] Stojan Auer supposedly supports Pivec

Here are the headlines from stories about candidate Franc Kangler:

1) Mini Intervju: Tanja Kangler stoji za svojim možem4
(Mini Interview: Tanja Kangler stands by her man)

Special Bonus Propaganda:

In the street poll on page four [Mnenja (Opinions)] four out of five people support Pivec. So much for displaying a fair, representative sample.

Finally, and perhaps crucially, here are the number of paid advertisements that appeared in the pre-election edition:

Campaign ads for Pivec: 1
Campaign ads for Kangler: 0


  1. A picture of this story is what you see at the top of this page, with Mr. Pivec looking mayor-like. The front-page story, which doesn’t mention the leading candidate at all, starts like this: “BodoÄ?i župan bo potreboval moÄ?no ekipo strokovnjakov in dober strateÅ¡ki program, da bo lahko izpolnil svoje obljube. Gregor Pivec je ekipo in program že predstavl gospodarstvenikom, strokovnjakom in javnosti. S tem so njegove predvolilne odljube dobile tudi trdno in realno podlago za uresniÄ?itev.” (The future mayor will need a strong team of professionals and a good strategic program to allow the mayor to fulfill his promises. Gregor Pivec introduced his team to businessmen, professionals and the public. With that, his pre-election promises were solidly and realistically grounded.) Can you fucking believe it? I mean, seriously, can you? [back]
  2. In this article, Pernat writes one introductory sentence, describing a widely circulated e-mail that criticizes Pivec, and then lets him respond for the rest of the entire story. In other words, the article is basically a ten-sentence-long quote. Pernat doesn’t mention the accusations in the e-mail. [back]
  3. This story is actually newsworthy. The problem is that it doesn’t mention the fact that other parties (notably the left-of-center LDS) threw their support behind Kangler. [back]
  4. This is actually pretty cunning, I think. “Standing by her man” is something the wife of an accused criminal would also do. Or at least someone who is under intense fire. The fact that the only story about Kangler is an interview with his wife also speaks volumes. [back]
Posted on Monday, November 13, 2006 to Slovenia

Comments

  • 1

    How utterly fair and balanced. Looks like they tooks lessons from the Republicans and Democrats over in the U.S., who don’t even suggest things; no, they either manufacture or dig up something ugly on their opponents and smear it out in TV ads and the likes. And just some hours ago, I heard the Socialists in France are doing it to their own, with her two - male - opposers releasing a taped party meeting behind closed doors in order to prevent Ségolène Royale (what a name, you just have to like her for that alone ;-)) becoming the first female - and strong favorite - candidate for the upcoming presidential election and throwing their political weight with the media and the unions to get the job done. All’s fair in love, war and politics, I guess. Ugly…

         by ARF on November 13, 2006 at 5:56 am

  • 2

    Actually, Žurnal is widely known for this kind of cheap propaganda. A couple of months ago, when the election campaign was just about to begin, we published a commentary with basically the same theme as this post - so rest assured that this was not a one-off event.

    Just last week Žurnal celebrated its 3rd birthday, and apparently it is doubtful if it will live to see the fourth. Hope not!

         by pengovsky on November 13, 2006 at 10:00 am

  • 3

    After having to digest campaign commercials from the US for the past month, I feel there is still an honest difference between a smear campaign from one party, to a strongly subjective article (or series) that is distributed to a quarter of a million readers.

    I would still rather watch smear ads (which can sometimes be stupidly ) than to know I am not being given a fair coverage of current events.

         by Marko on November 13, 2006 at 10:15 am

  • 4

    Sorry, I messed up the link somehow. The sentence was:

    “Which can sometimes be stupidly entertaining”

         by Marko on November 13, 2006 at 10:16 am

  • 5

    Zurnal is not a newspaper. It is a commercial add paper with some articles which guarantee that the commercials can not be banned from the mailboxes. Every article there is for sale and I think that they just assured them self another two years of prosperity with this election campaign.

         by cija on November 13, 2006 at 10:33 am

  • 6

    @cija: apparently not, because they are said to be losing advertisers rapidly.

         by pengovsky on November 13, 2006 at 11:58 am

  • 7

    That’s the government propaganda machine for you. But on the other hand, Zurnal is a privately owned newspaper and they can support whoever they want. OK, we know that newspapers should at least apeare to be somewhat objective and balanced, but that is really up to them. Zurnal never really had any credibility, so they actually had nothing to lose.

         by rox on November 13, 2006 at 12:04 pm

  • 8

    Just shows you how far the evil claw of Karl Rove extends.

         by DarkoV on November 13, 2006 at 6:34 pm

  • 9

    Well, the Ljubljana edition of Žurlan provides as distinguished journalism as the MariborÄ?an one.

    Hardly one issue goes out without a stab at Drnovšek and a praise for almighty Janša.

         by Carlitos on November 13, 2006 at 10:01 pm

  • 10

    As once quoted: “Bad politicians are elected by good citizens who do not vote.�

    I didn’t vote. Does this make Kangler bad politician?

         by Good citizen on November 13, 2006 at 10:04 pm

  • 11

    @Good citizen: the sentence
    “Good citizens who do not vote� does not implement that everybody who does not vote is automatically good; like every fish is not a trout but the opposite is true! But I do not wont to say this means Kangler is good.

         by Davor on November 14, 2006 at 11:40 am

  • 12

    a pre-electoral edition of Ljubljana version also had a few articles about events in Ljubljana the previous week. The interesting thing is that almost everywhere possible they included a photo of the mayor D.SimÅ¡iÄ? taking part in the event (speeches etc).

         by Igor on November 14, 2006 at 1:52 pm

  • 13

    I would have to agree with Marko. Žurnal is just a paper with letters and colour on it and absolutly not a reliable source of info. But when you think about elections a horrible thought comes to my mind that is actualy voters who vote and voters get what they want. Can you realy say that one was better than the other? It is all the same to me.

         by jera on November 17, 2006 at 2:45 pm

  • 14

    Oh I am truly sorry it was cija who made the comment and not Marko

         by jera on November 17, 2006 at 2:46 pm

Comments for this post are closed.